Latest by Chris Ross
High Court: Claimants' litigation funder ordered to provide security for costs
The High Court has handed down a significant judgment giving important guidance on the Court’s approach to issues of costs-sharing and security for costs against litigation funders in large multi-party claims. The judgment will be a key touchpoint in this developing area of law. RPC acts for Ingenious in the proceedings. The judgment citation is [2020] EWHC 235 (Ch).
Read more
Tortious claims against third party may trigger anti-suit injunction
A party's attempt to circumvent a jurisdiction clause by bringing tortious claims against a third party has been thwarted by the High Court. In granting an anti-suit injunction, the court explored the substance of the claims and found them to be "vexatious and oppressive", designed simply to evade the exclusive jurisdiction clause.
Read moreThe High Court removes its cap for litigation funders
The High Court has declined to cap a litigation funder's liability for adverse costs at the amount of funding provided. It confirmed that the so-called Arkin cap is an approach to be considered, not a rule to be followed (Davey v Money [2019] EWHC 997 (Ch)).
Read moreOn the eleventh day of Christmas, the High Court gave to me…eleven groups a-growing
Unlike Scrooge, litigation will not wake transformed on Christmas Day into a gentler, kinder activity. But it is undergoing a slower transformation with the growth of various forms of group litigation in England.
Read moreCourt of Appeal clarifies meaning of 'knowledge' for purposes of Limitation Act
In Su v Clarksons Platou Futures Ltd ([2018] EWCA Civ 1115) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision granting summary judgment against a claimant on the basis that his claim in negligence was time barred.
Read moreUnlawful distribution of shareholding: application of Limitation Act clarified
In Burden Holdings UK Limited v Fielding the Supreme Court considered the application of Section 21(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980 with respect to claims against the directors of a company for an unlawful distribution of the shareholding.
Read moreDefective service and culpable delay: a warning to claimants
Commercial Court refuses application for alternative service and strikes out claim forms after claimant's delay in pursuing claim.
Read moreHigh Court allows claim against foreign subsidiary and English parent company to be heard in the UK
The High Court has rejected applications by an English parent company and its Zambian subsidiary that claims brought against them in London should be dismissed in favour of proceedings taking place in Zambia.
Read moreSupreme Court clarifies law on implied terms
The Supreme Court has clarified the law on implied terms: in order for a term to be implied it must be necessary for business efficacy or alternatively be so obvious as to go without saying.
Read moreSupreme Court clarifies law on implied terms: "business efficacy" test remains
The Supreme Court has clarified the law on implied terms: in order for a term to be implied it must be necessary for business efficacy or alternatively be so obvious as to go without saying. In practice, it will be a rare case where one of those conditions is satisfied but not the other.
Read moreCourt of Appeal rules on limitation and concealment in competition damages claim
In the recent decision of Arcadia Group Brands Ltd & Ors v Visa Inc & Ors[1] ...
Read moreThe claimants that knew too much: High Court rules on applicability of concealment provisions in Limitation Act 1980 in competition damages claim
The Arcadia Group[1] case arose in the context of ongoing damages claims brought by a number of retailers and other merchants against both Visa and MasterCard for breaches of competition law in relation to the charging of interchange fees in the Visa and MasterCard payment systems.
Read moreThe importance of commercial considerations in contractual construction
The principles governing contractual interpretation under English law are reasonably well-established.
Read moreCourt shuts door on challenge to arbitral tribunal's findings
Applicants cannot use s.68 of the Arbitration Act to challenge indirectly the tribunal's finding of fact when they don’t like the decision made.
Read moreCommercial Court confirms principles relating to law governing arbitration agreements
The case of Habas Sinai v VSC Steel Company[1] reinforces the importance of providing for a governing law in contracts, particularly if the parties want an arbitration agreement to be governed by a different law from the law of the seat of the arbitration.
Read moreFinancial Litigation Roundup
Please click here for our bulletin containing a roundup of the key judgments from litigation in the banking sector in 2012/2013 and review of matters currently before the courts.
Read moreISDA publishes 2013 Arbitration Guide
ISDA (the International Swaps and Derivatives Association) has published the 2013 ISDA Arbitration Guide, ...
Read moreThe English court's power to grant anti-suit injunctions in support of arbitration
The Supreme Court judgment in Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC v AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP [2013] ...
Read moreLIBOR manipulation claim stumbles
In Deutsche Bank AG v Unitech Global Limited 2013 EWHC 471 (Comm) Cooke J refused permission for the defendants to amend their defence and counterclaim to refer to misrepresentations relating to the alleged manipulation of LIBOR by Deutsche Bank, on the basis that the amended claims had no reasonable prospect of success.
Read more