Latest by Laura Stocks
Reflective loss in claims against solicitors and accountants after Marex
The so called "rule against reflective loss" has been clarified in an important decision handed down by the Supreme Court in Marex Financial Ltd v Sevilleja [2020] UKSC 31.
Read morePrivilege Absolute: documents remain privileged forever, unless privilege is waived
The Court of Appeal has taken a robust stance against an attempt to retrospectively redraw the boundaries of legal professional privilege in the recent decision of Addlesee and others v Dentons Europe LLP1.
Read moreChallenge to SRA intervention rejected
Suspicion of wrongdoing in law firms gives rise to difficult judgments.
Read moreThe hidden costs of divorce – lawyers beware the price tag!
As a result of the Supreme Court's decision on 14 October 2015 in the cases of Sharland and Gohil, parties in divorce proceedings are now able to re-open their financial settlements where there is evidence of fraudulent non-disclosure.
Read moreDon't (Calder) bank on an analogy to the Part 36 regime
When a party makes a Part 36 Offer, the consequences are clear. The rules and sanctions for failure to beat a Part 36 Offer are set out in the Civil Procedure Rules.
Read moreSolicitors not under a duty to ensure that court staff issue in time
This case Page v Hewetts Solicitors caused a stir back in November when the high court held that a claim form was statute barred notwithstanding evidence it had been received by the court in time.
Read moreSolicitors not under a duty to ensure that court staff issue in time
This case Page v Hewetts Solicitors caused a stir back in November when the high court held that a claim form was statute barred notwithstanding evidence it had been received by the court in time.
Read more