Latest by Parham Kouchikali

Blog

Property Alliance Group Limited v The Royal Bank of Scotland plc – a pyrrhic victory?

Published on 04 April 2018. By Parham Kouchikali, Partner and Joe Cresswell, Associate

Gray tint 4

The Court of Appeal handed down its much anticipated judgment on the misselling and LIBOR manipulation test case in March. Whilst the appeal was dismissed in full, the Court of Appeal's decision clarified a number of aspects of the law in this area and, in particular, the circumstances in which an implied representation in respect of LIBOR would arise.

Read more
Blog

Don't be scared – it's just an exemption clause

Published on 05 July 2017. By Parham Kouchikali, Partner and Ed Holmes, Associate

Gray tint 3 wide

The Court of Appeal holds that an exemption clause is wide enough to exclude liability for negligence for a failure to identify asbestos.

Read more
Blog

Demand guarantees not subject to doctrine of strict compliance

Published on 21 February 2017. By Parham Kouchikali, Partner

Abstract building

High Court holds that the doctrine of strict compliance does not automatically apply to demand guarantees (or performance bonds) in the way that it applies to letters of credit.

Read more
Blog

Another meander through Three Rivers (No 5): the scope of legal advice privilege

Published on 22 December 2016. By Maria Petzsch, Registered Foreign Lawyer (England & Wales) and Parham Kouchikali, Partner

Untinted 2

The High Court rejected RBS' claim that interview notes taken by the bank and its external lawyers in the course of two internal investigations were privileged.

Read more
Blog

Intention to be bound: High Court construes commitment letter against equity participant

Published on 09 November 2016. By Parham Kouchikali, Partner and Matthew Evans, Senior Associate

Untinted 4

The High Court held that the defendant signatory to a commitment letter intended to be legally bound by that document and was consequently in anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract. The decision highlights the need for contracting parties to be clear in documenting both their internal and external decision-making processes.

Read more
Blog

Supreme Court clarifies law on implied terms: "business efficacy" test remains

Published on 21 January 2016. By Chris Ross, Partner and Parham Kouchikali, Partner

The Supreme Court has clarified the law on implied terms: in order for a term to be implied it must be necessary for business efficacy or alternatively be so obvious as to go without saying. In practice, it will be a rare case where one of those conditions is satisfied but not the other.

Read more
Blog

Court of Appeal permits early redemption of Lloyds Banking Group's Enhanced Capital Notes

Published on 04 January 2016. By Matthew Evans, Senior Associate and Parham Kouchikali, Partner

In BNY Mellon Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v LBG Capital No.1 and No. 2 Plc, the Court of Appeal reversed the first instance decision of the High Court, by allowing early redemption of certain convertible securities (known as Enhanced Capital Notes, or ECNs).

Read more
Blog

High Court rejects interest rate swap misselling claim

Published on 22 December 2015. By Daniel Hemming, Senior Associate and Parham Kouchikali, Partner

In Thornbridge Limited v Barclays Bank PLC the High Court considered a claim for the missale of an interest rate swap based on several different causes of action, all of which were unsuccessful.

Read more
Blog

Supreme Court broadens scope of freezing order wording

Published on 30 November 2015. By Emma Griffiths, Senior Associate and Parham Kouchikali, Partner

A recent decision[1] of the Supreme Court has clarified the scope of the standard form Commercial Court freezing order, holding that the right to draw down monies under a loan agreement can be an "asset" where the extended form freezing order is granted.

Read more
Blog

Court refuses stay in favour of Italian proceedings under 2001 Brussels Regulation

Published on 06 November 2015. By Laura Martin, Senior Associate and Parham Kouchikali, Partner

The Commercial Court has declined to stay an English action[1] in favour of prior proceedings in Italy, notwithstanding the fact that the dispute pre-dated the application of the Recast Regulation.

Read more