Search
LIBOR: Litigation risks in the endgame?

In 2021 we will bid farewell to LIBOR and welcome in SONIA. The two systems work in different ways, with LIBOR looking forward and SONIA looking back.
Read moreJurisdiction and the Rule of Law

In R (oao Boulting & Anor) v HMRC [2020] EWHC 2207 (Admin), the High Court refused permission to bring a judicial review claim against HMRC, on the basis that the taxpayer had an 'alternative remedy'.
Read moreNeat infringement claim leaves whiskey competitor’s trade mark on the rocks

The producers of Eagle Rare bourbon whiskey have succeeded in their trade mark infringement claim against competitor, American Eagle. The case highlights the impact of market-specific context in determining whether consumers are likely to be confused by similar trade marks. Whilst the case has general relevance, it will be of specific interest to alcohol and luxury goods brands.
Read moreNeat infringement claim leaves whiskey competitor’s trade mark on the rocks

The producers of Eagle Rare bourbon whiskey have succeeded in their trade mark infringement claim against competitor, American Eagle. The case highlights the impact of market-specific context in determining whether consumers are likely to be confused by similar trade marks. Whilst the case has general relevance, it will be of specific interest to alcohol and luxury goods brands.
Read moreSnapshots Autumn 2020

A roundup of key legal developments for the modern commercial lawyer.
Read more10 tips for preparing a Section 172 Statement

For financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2019, all large private companies must include a statement in their annual report and accounts explaining how the directors have had regard to the matters in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 when performing their duties.
Read moreThe EECC, the ePD and the GDPR – a complex interplay creating a breach notification nightmare for providers of communications services

What impact will the implementation of the new Directive establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (2018/1972) (EECC) have on the scope and application of the ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) (ePD) for providers of electronic communication services?
Read moreH&M hit with €35.3m fine for GDPR employee breach

How did H&M’s internal data collection processes land it with the second largest fine in data breach history?
Read moreICO publishes guidance on AI decision making

How can companies comply with data regulation when using AI to make decisions affecting individuals?
Read moreEU social media targeting guidelines – call for feedback

Who are the key actors in the targeting of social media users, and what can they learn from the EU's new social media targeting guidelines?
Read moreDMA issues “Seven-Step Ad Tech Guide” in a bid to restore trust in online advertising

What needs to be done by UK businesses actively engaged in the programmatic delivery of digital advertising to ensure they protect the rights of individuals?
Read moreWhat were the CMA’s key findings in its final report on online platforms and digital advertising?

What can be learned from the European Commission’s new guidelines on the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD)?
Read moreAudiovisual Media Services Directive – European Commission adopts guidelines on video-sharing platforms and the promotion of European works

What can be learned from the European Commission’s new guidelines on the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD)?
Read moreCopyright: Online platform operators’ liability for users illegally uploading copyright material

C-682/18 Frank Peterson v Google LLC and others and C 683/18 Elsevier Inc. v Cyando AG EU:C:2020:586 – A-G opinion
Read moreThe ASA’s new UK Scam Alert System

What is the latest tool in the ASA’s technology toolbox to combat misleading advertising online?
Read moreWish.com: sexually explicit in-app ads deemed offensive and inappropriately targeted

Will an ad of a sexually graphic nature be deemed to be inappropriately targeting consumers and causing harm and offence if it appears on general audience platforms?
Read moreBOXT: ‘next day delivery’ and comparative pricing claims

How careful do you need to be with “next day delivery” claims? And is one product comparison enough when making a price comparison claim?
Read moreSky UK: clarity over upfront costs and different fees charged to different groups

Do you need to include additional upfront costs in the main body of your ad? And how clear do you need to be about different fees being charged to different groups of consumers (eg existing vs new customers)?
Read moreP&G: verification requirements in comparative advertising campaigns

How much detail do you need to include to meet the verification requirements under the CAP Code when making comparisons with identifiable competitors?
Read morePlayrix: gameplay footage must be representative of the gaming experience

When advertising a game, can you use gameplay footage which does not actually feature in the game, or only features to a limited degree?
Read moreContractual interpretation: the dangers of inconsistency between formulae and worked examples

Altera Voyageur Production Limited v Premier Oil E&P UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 1891 (Comm)
Read moreGood faith: relational contracts and the implied duty of good faith

Essex County Council v UBB Waste (Essex) Limited [2020] EWHC 1581 (TCC)
Read moreRestrictive covenants: restraint of trade and bespoke contracts

Quantum Advisory Ltd v Quantum Actuarial LLP [2020] EWHC 1072 (Comm)
Read moreContractual interpretation rectification not possible purely for a tax benefit

MV Promotions Ltd and another v Telegraph Media Group Ltd and another [2020] EWHC 1357 (Ch)
Read moreTake 10 #5

Welcome to RPC's media and communications law update. This issue reports on key media developments and the latest cases.
Read moreThe illegality defence – Stoffel v Grondona revisited

"No court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act." This was the opening line of the Supreme Court's 2016 decision in Patel v Mirza , quoting the decision of Lord Mansfield in Holman v Johnson from 1775. Why then has the Supreme Court – in Stoffel v Grondona - declined the appeal of a firm of solicitors who relied on this long established principle when defending itself from a professional negligence action brought by a fraudster?
Read moreThe week that was - 30th October 2020

Welcome to The Week That Was, a round-up of key events in the construction sector over the last seven days.
Read moreV@ update - October 2020

Welcome to the October 2020 edition of RPC's V@, an update on developments in the VAT world that may impact your business.
Read moreNew SFO guide to DPAs: material change, or confirmation of approach?

Last week, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) published a comprehensive guide to its approach to Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs).
Read moreTaxing Matters: A handy guide to appeals

Welcome to the eighth episode of our Taxing Matters podcast. In this series we review land-mark cases and key tax developments and discuss the commercial impact they could have on your business.
Read moreBig data and data profiling in the insurance industry

Welcome to Insurance Covered! The podcast that looks at the inner workings of the insurance industry with the help of expert guests.
Read moreHidden owners, ostensible authority and the Duomatic principle

The Duomatic principle can apply to ostensible authority as well as actual authority, according to the Privy Council in Ciban Management Corporation v Citco (BVI) Ltd & Anor (British Virgin Islands) [2020] UKPC 21.
Read moreSports Ticker (23rd Oct 2020) - Project Big Picture, British horseracing and TRP v SIS

Welcome to the latest edition of the RPC Sports Ticker - providing fortnightly bite-size updates from around the sports industry.
Read moreSwift v Carpenter: A new approach to accommodation claims

The recent landmark decision in Swift v Carpenter (2020) demonstrates a fundamental change in the way that accommodation claims in personal injury cases are quantified, in a manner that is likely to have a significant impact on the value of those claims. Below we take a brief look at how the assessment of accommodation claims has changed, and consider the impact this might have on insurers involved in professional negligence cases arising out of personal injury cases.
Read moreThe Week That Was - 23rd October 2020

Welcome to The Week That Was, a round-up of key events in the construction sector over the last seven days.
Read moreRegulatory update - October 2020

Welcome to the October edition of the Regulatory update, which pulls together recent developments from across the UK’s regulators – to help you navigate the regulatory maze.
Read moreHold on to your seats: UK Supreme Court ends the argument about the law governing arbitration agreements

Identifying what law governs a contractual term requiring the parties to arbitrate their disputes, rather than taking them to court, can be profoundly important.
Read moreCyber_Bytes - Issue 24

Welcome to Cyber_Bytes, our bi-weekly round up of key developments in cyber, tech and evolving risks.
Read moreWired Orthodontics – Tribunal expresses concern about potential inappropriate interference by HMRC's solicitor with the evidence of an independent expert witness

In Wired Orthodontics Ltd and others v HMRC [2020] UKFTT 290 (TC), the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) refused an application for disclosure of documents and information passing between the solicitors for HMRC and their appointed expert witness.
Read moreRPC Bites #19

Welcome to RPC Bites. Our aim in the next 2 minutes is to provide you with a flavour of some key legal, regulatory and commercial developments in the Food & Drink sector over the last fortnight… with the occasional bit of industry gossip thrown in for good measure. Enjoy!!
Read moreTake 10 #4

Welcome to RPC's media and communications law update. This issue reports on key media developments and the latest cases.
Read moreThe rule of DAC6 - are you ready?

UK companies involved in cross-border transactions need to be aware of looming reporting deadlines imposed by EU law and now implemented in the UK . These rules are designed to facilitate the reporting and sharing between EU tax authorities of instances of tax planning. However, the types of transactions caught by these rules are not limited to aggressive tax planning arrangements. In a number of cases, it is not a requirement for there to be a tax motive for the transaction to be reportable.
Read moreCorporate Tax Update - October 2020

Welcome to the latest edition of our Corporate Tax Update, written by members of RPC’s tax team. This month’s update reports on some of the key developments from September 2020. Included in this update are summaries of the Chancellor’s tax announcements as part of the Winter Economy Plan and the EC’s decision to appeal the decision of the European General Court in the Apple state aid case. There are also updates on new HMRC guidance on off-payroll working for private businesses and the VAT treatment of payments for early termination of contracts. As ever we hope you, your family and friends are all staying safe.
Read moreBuyer Beware: NHSX Guidance on Artificial Intelligence

NHSX Guide on AI is a useful resource for manufacturers and insurers in mitigating litigation risks
Read moreBox – child benefit charge interpreted as 'income' for the purpose of discovery assessments

In Martin Richard Box v HMRC [2020] UKFTT 353 (TC), the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) dismissed a taxpayer's appeal concerning liability to pay the high-income child benefit (HICB) charge, on the basis that the charge constituted income for the purpose of discovery assessments.
Read moreTaxing matters: Predicting the tax world of the future

Welcome to the seventh episode of our Taxing Matters podcast. In this series we review land-mark cases and key tax developments and discuss the commercial impact they could have on your business.
Read more