Latest by Davina Given

Blog

Privilege: A welcome respite from ENRC?

Published on 05 February 2018. By Davina Given, Partner and Mafruhdha Miah, Trainee Solicitor

Green tint 2

Are interviews held with employees to prepare a report intended to deter a governmental authority from taking legal action privileged?

Read more
Blog

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: harsh but fair?

Published on 05 May 2017. By Davina Given, Partner

Purple tint

A recent case highlights the dilemma of businesses whose assets are frozen as suspected proceeds of crime.

Read more
Blog

Lessons learned from Property Alliance Group v RBS

Published on 25 April 2017. By Daniel Hemming, Senior Associate and Davina Given, Partner

Gray tint 1

This article assesses the key aspects of the High Court's judgment and considers their implications for similar claims.

Read more
Blog

Guidance on the "cardinal rule" for implying terms

Published on 21 April 2017. By Ed Holmes, Associate and Davina Given, Partner

Untinted 5

In Irish Bank Resolution Corp Ltd (In Special Liquidation) v Camden Market Holdings Corp the Court of Appeal held that a term could not be implied into an agreement because, although it was linguistically consistent, it was substantively inconsistent with the express terms. In doing so, the court shed further light on the application of the "cardinal rule" that an implied term must not contradict any of the express terms of the contract.

Read more
Blog

Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Act 2017: what do collectors and dealers need to know?

Published on 19 April 2017. By Davina Given, Partner

Green tint 4

The UK Parliament has recently passed the Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Act 2017. Although the provisions of the Act have not yet come into force, how will this impact collectors and dealers?

Read more
Blog

The law of unintended consequences

Published on 12 April 2017. By Victoria Sugden, Senior Associate and Davina Given, Partner

Green tint 1

Why professional indemnity insurers should closely examine losses in professional negligence claims

Read more
Blog

Prior arbitral award – abuse of process?

Published on 30 March 2017. By Davina Given, Partner

Green tint 3

Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Sinclair and others [2017] EWCA Civ 3 demonstrates the interplay between arbitration and litigation, considering whether legal proceedings commenced by A against C are an abuse of the court's process where arbitration proceedings between A and B have decided the issue in question. The Court of Appeal held that a prior arbitration award can found an argument that subsequent litigation against a third party is an abuse of process, but will rarely do so. On the facts of this case, the claim was not considered to be an abuse of process.

Read more
Blog

The long arm of the law: chasing the proceeds of (alleged) crime

Published on 13 February 2017. By Davina Given, Partner

Purple tint 1

The English Court has recently upheld a freezing order over the sale proceeds from shares alleged to be a Canadian company's bribes to a Chadian diplomat's wife in the US.

Read more
Blog

"It's privileged" – is not enough! High Court orders a full list of each document over which a claim to privilege is asserted

Published on 20 December 2016. By Alexis Armitage, Associate and Davina Given, Partner

Green tint 1

The High Court held that a defendant's claim to privilege in respect of communications between employees and in-house counsel went too far. It ordered the defendant to provide a full list of each document over which the defendant asserted a claim to privilege, together with an explanation of the nature of the privileged claimed.

Read more
Blog

Sidestepping Limitation: A Cautionary Tale

Published on 03 October 2016. By Charlotte Ducker, Senior Associate and Davina Given, Partner

Green tint 2

The defendants were able to make a contribution claim from a third party after settling a competition damages claim with the claimant, even though the third party had a limitation defence against the claimant, which could have extinguished both the defendant's and the third party's liability to the claimant.

Read more