IP Hub
Vestergaard – guarding trade secrets
The Supreme Court has ruled, in the final stage of this case, that an ex-employee could not have misused confidential information if she did not know about (i) the confidential information; and (ii) the fact of its misuse.
Read moreInterflora v Marks and Spencer
Following years of legal wrangling between Interflora and Marks and Spencer (M&S) in respect of keyword advertising, on 21 May 2013, the High Court handed down a substantial 99 page judgment, ultimately, in favour of Interflora as trademark owner.
Read moreCopyright: Supreme Court Considers "Browsing Defence"
The Supreme Court has handed down its long awaited decision in the Meltwater case which addresses important questions about the application of copyright law to internet browsing.
Read moreCut off the head but beware that the sub-licence may not die
In the recent High Court decision VLM Holdings Limited v Ravensworth Digital Services Limited [1] Mann J has ruled that a sub-licence is capable of surviving termination of its head licence in certain (albeit, fact-specific) circumstances.
Read moreHigh Court finds that "History" can be repeated
A highly anticipated High Court decision was handed down 1 February 2013 dismissing claims for trade mark infringement and passing off brought by A & E Television Networks LLC and its UK subsidiary AETN against Discovery Communications Europe Ltd.
Read moreHigh Court reaffirms no copyright protection for computer program functionality
In what should be the final instalment in a long-running case, on January 25 2013 a decision was issued in SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd[i] following the referral back to the High Court from the European Court of Justice (ECJ)
Read moreSupreme Court clarifies what constitutes 'making' a patented product
On 13 March 2013 the Supreme Court issued its weighty decision in the long-running case of Schütz v Werit([2013] UKSC 16).
Read moreSurveying the legal landscape
The Court of Appeal has handed down its much anticipated judgment on the admissibility of survey evidence in the long running trade mark dispute between Marks & Spencer and Interflora.
Read more